Grammar-punctuation errors in Tampa-Bay publications
Monday, December 17, 2007
Pulitzer Misfires: Inducts Tash
Grammar-punctuation of Tampa- Bay-area publications
Mr. Graham, Pulitzer Prize Committee Chair:
Had I known in 2006 that Paul Tash got the nod to join the Pulitzer Committee, I would have protested the appointment on two grounds: sexism and grammar.
Sexism: The committee’s female membership is 5 out of 17: 30 percent. Women are more than fifty percent of the population. They should have nine members on the committee and the guys eight. Fair is fair.
Mr. Tash’s addition increased the disparity and not only that: his newspaper masthead is a male locker room. I ran a study a few years ago, and most of the front-page bylines were male. And this misogyny comes from a man with two daughters.
Besides, Mr. Tash’s essay below shows he has not mastered the basic tool of his trade: writing. He messes up commas, stumbles into subject-verb-agreement felonies, and writes in a rhetorical style that sounds as if he just stepped off the bus from his natal state of Indiana . I don’t know if Le Paul aims to mimic faux Noble Savage or whether he thinks his is a beguiling untutored style.
Mr. Tash graduated summa cum laude from Indiana University . I think that fact does Indiana University no credit. I understand that all you have to do to graduate summa cum laude from the University of Indiana is to pick the hayseed out of your teeth.
Indiana University has a Phi Beta Kappa chapter despite its being the site of that movie about the Cutters and the university soi-disant football aristocratic knights of the Indiana Round Table—God knows how it got a chapter with the PBK snoots that infest the national office.
I don’t see Mr. Tash at any PBK hoedowns in the Tampa Bay area with the forlorn souls that stand as the local intellectuals that leaveneth the whole lump in these know-nothing badlands, the denizens of which inhabit Mr. Tash’s readership lists.
I haven’t heard that Le Tash has put in a good word for USF to get a PBK chapter even though one is sure that it deserves one as much as Indiana University does--probably more. I infer that the PBK leaders went to Indiana in an antic mood and awarded the University of Indiana a chapter as a lark because they were liquored up on a a Lost Weekend. PBK obdurately refuses all the pleas from USF for a chapter, the utter toads.
So the area’s university stands bereft of a Phi Beta Kappa chapter because carpetbagger Tash refuses to throw his weight around and lobby for one. What good is it to be the Times publisher and now member of the flossier Pulitzer sexist board if you can’t help the home team get a PBK chapter for Pete’s sake?
Don’t let the LA Times’s Scott Timberg’s pretensions (below) of drama expertise rattle you. Never kowtow to an intellectual-manqué who doesn’t know his ass from his elbow in grammar and punctuation when he lectures you on drama aesthetics. Scott is the old miles gloriosus of Greek dramaturgy, who doesn’t know his ass from his elbow in either drama or grammar.
Ma ke a pledge to run any future Pulitzer committee- member appointments by me because I can see from the lopsidedness of the male-female count that you can’t handle this issue. I think this sexist statistic is a dimension of male performance anxiety and will send the dilemma to the CDC for official investigation of Pulitzer sexual malaise and also for a review of the Cialis-Viagra conglomerates which have an interest in outcomes that are bound to reveal that if PBK headquarters committee men imbibe Cialis or Viagra p.o, IV, or subq, they will make decisions on members to induct with infalliable aplomb and right the sexual disparity before the snow flies with a chapter for USF.
Meanwhile, you must send Le Paul Tash to remedial grammar-punctuation training as a condition of his remaining on the committee, and you must not trust Mr. William Safire to instruct him on commas. I did my best to teach Mr. Safire comma lore when he was a columnist at the NYT. He suffers invincible ignorance in the area, however, and y’all should kick him off the committee to make room for another woman.
Mr. Tash's wife is an English teacher whom he could have consulted to correct his literacy problems. But men of Tash's ilk think us wimmenfolk are for childbearing, slopping the hogs, and holding up a mirror to them to reflect them twice their size.I ask that you give a copy of this missive to all members of the Pulitzer committee to fast and pray over. I expect the five women on the committee to be Aunt Toms as were the legions who joined the male misogynists in calling the suffragists “hyenas in petticoats” during the struggle for suffrage. By some miracle, be there one who protests the lopsided sexist count on the Pulitzer committee, she is my girlfriend. If not, she is Phyllis Schafley’s girlfriend and must use Phyllis’s cement-based hairspray for life.
(Ms.) Lee Drury De Cesare (middle Valkyrie in pink at the Women’s Ma rch for Choice in Washington, DC, in which she had the thrill of being called a Jezebel by a curbside born-again bigot even though she is a granny of ten.)
15316 Gulf Boulevard 802
Ma deira Beach , FL 33708
Lee_decesare@yahoo.com
Grammargrinch.blogspot.com
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Pulitzer Puttering
LA Times' Scott Timberg has more dope on the backstage drama of Drama at the Pulitzers, 2007:
The 17-member Pulitzer board couldn't reach a required majority vote on the nominees and faced a second consecutive year without awarding a prize in drama, Pulitzer administrator Sig Gissler said Monday. "Rabbit Hole” had been "mentioned favorably" in the jury's report, Gissler said, and the board, by a required three-quarters majority, Redundant commas: the adverbial prepositional phrase is restrictive. sidestepped the nominees and gave it the prize.
So, to recap, here's what happened. The "jurors" There is no reason to put quotation marks around this word. selected to nominate plays (Ben Brantley, Paula Vogel, two regional theatre critics, and a Haverford English professor) submitted three titles they deemed the best of the year. Surprisingly, and to their credit, the redundant adverb and cliché phrase are wordy: dump both. all three were relatively Wordy redundant adverb. little known, aesthetically and/or politically Jettison clunky redundant adverbs. challenging pieces nowhere near Broadway. They were:
"Orpheus X" by Rinde Eckert
"Bulrusher" by Eisa Davis
"Elliot, a Soldier's Fugue" by Quiara Alegría Hudes
Now some are already chiming in with ho-hum reactions to having seen these. I didn't see them. But I'm still impressed that the jury (a jury that included the New York Times lead drama critic!) went ahead and The exclamation point is excessive; “went ahead and” sounds like a hillbilly verb. Dump. submitted such refreshing and unorthodox Forego one of these adjectives. titles without even making a gesture not only to Broadway, but the comma splits compound adverbial prepositional phrases. even to sanctioned nonprofit "safe houses" for new plays like
So then those three titles had to be voted on Passive verbs vitiate: edit to “So the gang of seventeen” had to vote on…”by the gang of seventeen. There is no known mechanics rule that justifies this use of italics. Who are these Pulitzer Board members, you may ask?
In alphabetical order:
Lee
Danielle Allen, Professor, Departments of Classics and Political Science and the Committee on Social Thought, University of Chicago
Jim Amoss, Editor, Times-Picayune, New Orleans, La.
Amanda Bennett, Executive Editor/Enterprise, Bloomberg News
Joann Byrd, Former Editor of the Editorial Page,
Kathleen Carroll, Executive Editor and Senior Vice President, Associated Press
Anders Gyllenhaal, Executive Editor, The Miami Herald
Jay T. Harris, Wallis Annenberg Chair, Director, Center for the Study of Journalism and Democracy, Annenberg School of Communication, University of Southern California
Nicholas Lemann, Dean, Graduate School of Journalism, Columbia University
Ann
Gregory L. Moore, Editor, The Denver Post
Richard Oppel, Editor, Austin American-Statesman
Mike Pride, Editor, Concord (N.H.) Monitor
Paul Tash, Editor, CEO, and Chairman, St. Petersburg Times
I'll tell you something I notice about this list. None of them, not one, could remotely be considered an artist or even an arts specialist. Given the Pulitzers are a Journalism/Media entity--famous for giving certain highly prestigious awards to the arts, the fact not one critic is on the ultimately decisive board is pretty shocking. And insulting to the arts.
Can you really imagine any of these people--let's just say even the New York-based ones--seeing any of the plays nominated? Or is the theatre going experience of journalist cognoscenti like Nicholas Lemann and Tom Friedman limited to a token
Ok, I don't know if either of them subscribes to MT
Here's another theory: are the scripts of the plays provided for the jurors, and the board, to read? Since very few people saw the nominated plays, one would hope everyone at least read them. However--while I didn't see them, I know enough about the work of Rinde Eckert and Eisa Davis (basically performance artists) and know from the reviews of "Elliot"--that these are profoundly visual and performative works. In nominating these titles, the jurors were also taking the bold step of saying the most exciting new plays out there are not necessarily primarily literary.
(I can't help wondering if the same problem is what hurt the two-woman AIDS documentary piece In The Continuum--the play rumored to be the juror's favorite last year.)
I can only imagine these three scripts might have been baffling reads for the board. (Imagine reading an avant-garde theatre text for the first time, without the visual aid/supplement of performance.) At least, a lot more grueling a read than... Rabbit Hole?
Yes, Rabbit Hole is easy to like, if what you ask from theatre is just good story, poignant emotion, and a glamorous lead performance. And, yes, it also hails from both
Which is probably exactly what the board considers its charge to do.
All Pulitzer info from the official site. (No direct links to specific pages possible. So, happy hunting!)
Paul Tash speaks: |
Thanks very much for the chance to be with you today at the Inland Press Association, and for the chance to come home for a short while to the |
posted by twinkobie at 8:19 AM
Post a Comment