Mr. Graham, Pulitzer Prize Committee Chair:
Had I known in 2006 that Paul Tash got the nod to join the Pulitzer Committee, I would have protested the appointment on two grounds: sexism and grammar.
Sexism: The committee’s female membership is 5 out of 17: 30 percent.  Women are more than fifty percent of the population.  They should have nine members on the committee and the guys eight. Fair is fair.
Mr. Tash’s addition increased the disparity and not only that: his newspaper masthead is a male locker room.  I ran a study a few years ago, and most of the front-page bylines were male.  And this misogyny comes from a man with two daughters.
Besides, Mr. Tash’s essay below shows he has not mastered the basic tool of his trade: writing.  He messes up commas, stumbles into subject-verb-agreement felonies, and writes in a rhetorical style that sounds as if he just stepped off the bus from his natal state of Indiana. I don’t know if Le Paul aims to mimic faux Noble Savage or whether he thinks his is a beguiling  untutored style.
Mr. Tash graduated summa cum laude from Indiana University. I think that fact does Indiana University no credit.  Indiana University has a Phi Beta Kappa chapter despite its being the site of that movie about the Cutters and the university soi-disant football aristocratic knights of the Indiana Round Table—God knows how it got a chapter with the PBK snoots that infest the national office.
I don’t see Mr. Tash at any PBK hoedowns in the Tampa Bay area with the forlorn souls that  stand as the local intellectuals that leaveneth the whole lump in these know-nothing badlands, the denizens of which inhabit Mr. Tash’s readership lists.
I haven’t heard that Le Tash has put in a good word for USF to get a PBK chapter even though one is sure that it deserves one as much as Indiana University does—probably more.  I infer that  the PBK leaders went to Indiana in an antic mood and awarded the University of Indiana a chapter as a lark because they were  liquored up on a a Lost Weekend.  PBK obdurately refuses all the pleas from USF for a chapter, the utter toads.
So the area’s university stands bereft of a Phi Beta Kappa chapter because carpetbagger Tash refuses to throw his weight around and lobby for one.  What good is it to be the Times publisher and now member of the flossier Pulitzer sexist board if you can’t help the home team get a PBK chapter for Pete’s sake?
Don’t let the LA Times’s Scott Timberg’s pretensions (below) of drama expertise rattle you.  Never kowtow to an intellectual-manqué  who doesn’t know his ass from his elbow in grammar and punctuation when he lectures you on drama aesthetics.  Scott is the old miles gloriosus of Greek dramaturgy,  who doesn’t know his ass from his elbow in either drama or grammar.
Make a pledge to run any future Pulitzer committee- member appointments by me because I can see from the lopsidedness of the male-female count that you can’t handle this issue.  I think this sexist statistic is a dimension of male performance anxiety and will send the dilemma to the CDC for official investigation of  Pulitzer sexual  malaise and also for a review of  the Cialis-Viagra conglomerates which have an interest in  outcomes that are bound to reveal that if PBK headquarters committee men imbibe Cialis or Viagra p.o, IV, or subq, they will  make decisions on members to induct with infalliable aplomb and right the sexual disparity before the snow flies with a chapter for USF.
Meanwhile, you must send Le Paul Tash to remedial grammar-punctuation training as a condition of his remaining on the committee, and you must not trust Mr. William Safire to instruct him on commas.  I did my best to teach Mr. Safire  comma lore when he was a columnist at the NYT.  He suffers invincible ignorance in the area, however, and y’all should kick him off the committee to make room for another woman.
I ask that you give a copy of this missive to all members of the Pulitzer committee to fast and pray over.  I expect the five women on the committee to be Aunt Toms as were the legions who joined the male misogynists in calling the suffragists “hyenas in petticoats” during the struggle for suffrage.  By some miracle, be there one  who protests the lopsided sexist count on the Pulitzer committee, she is my girlfriend.  If not, she is Phyllis Schafley’s girlfriend and must use Phyllis’s cement-based hairspray for life.
(Ms.) Lee Drury De Cesare (middle Valkyrie in pink at the Women’s March for Choice in Washington, DC, in which she had the thrill of being called a Jezebel by a curbside born-again bigot even though she is a granny of ten.)
15316 Gulf Boulevard 802
Madeira Beach, FL 33708
Lee_decesare@yahoo.com
Grammargrinch.blogspot.com
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Pulitzer Puttering
LA Times' Scott Timberg has more dope on the backstage drama of Drama at the Pulitzers, 2007:
The 17-member Pulitzer board couldn't reach a required majority vote on the nominees and faced a second consecutive year without awarding a prize in drama, Pulitzer administrator Sig Gissler said Monday. "Rabbit Hole” had been "mentioned favorably" in the jury's report, Gissler said, and the board, by a required three-quarters majority, Redundant commas: the adverbial prepositional phrase is restrictive. sidestepped the nominees and gave it the prize.
So, to recap, here's what happened. The "jurors" There is no reason to put quotation marks around this word. selected to nominate plays (Ben Brantley, Paula Vogel, two regional theatre critics, and a Haverford English professor) submitted three titles they deemed the best of the year. Surprisingly, and to their credit, the redundant adverb and cliché phrase are wordy: dump both. all three were relatively Wordy redundant adverb.  little known, aesthetically and/or politically Jettison clunky redundant adverbs. challenging pieces nowhere near Broadway. They were:
"Orpheus X" by Rinde Eckert
"Bulrusher" by Eisa Davis
"Elliot, a Soldier's Fugue" by Quiara Alegría Hudes
Now some are already chiming in with ho-hum reactions to having seen these. I didn't see them. But I'm still impressed that the jury (a jury that included the New York Times lead drama critic!) went ahead and The exclamation point is excessive; “went ahead and” sounds like a hillbilly verb. Dump.  submitted such refreshing and unorthodox Forego one of these adjectives.  titles without even making a gesture not only to Broadway, but the comma splits compound adverbial prepositional phrases. even to sanctioned nonprofit "safe houses" for new plays like Manhattan Theatre Club, South Coast Rep, etc.
So then those three titles had to be voted on Passive verbs vitiate: edit to “So the gang of seventeen” had to vote on…”by the gang of seventeen. There is no known mechanics rule that justifies this use of italics. Who are these Pulitzer Board members, you may ask?
In alphabetical order:
Lee C. Bollinger, President, Columbia University
Danielle Allen, Professor, Departments of Classics and Political Science and the Committee on Social Thought, University of Chicago
Jim Amoss, Editor, Times-Picayune, New Orleans, La.
Amanda Bennett, Executive Editor/Enterprise, Bloomberg News
Joann Byrd, Former Editor of the Editorial Page, Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Kathleen Carroll, Executive Editor and Senior Vice President, Associated Press
Thomas L. Friedman., Columnist, The New York Times
Donald E. Graham, Chairman, 
(Chair, goddamit) The Washington Post
Anders Gyllenhaal, Executive Editor, The Miami Herald
Jay T. Harris, Wallis Annenberg Chair, Director, Center for the Study of Journalism and Democracy, Annenberg School of Communication, University of Southern California
David M. Kennedy, Donald J. McLachlan Professor of History, Stanford University
Nicholas Lemann, Dean, Graduate School of Journalism, Columbia University
Ann Marie Lipinski, Senior Vice President and Editor, Chicago Tribune
Gregory L. Moore, Editor, The Denver Post
Richard Oppel, Editor, Austin American-Statesman
Mike Pride, Editor, Concord (N.H.) Monitor
Paul Tash, Editor, CEO, and Chairman, St. Petersburg Times
I'll tell you something I notice about this list. None of them, not one, could remotely be considered an artist or even an arts specialist. Given the Pulitzers are a Journalism/Media entity--famous for giving certain highly prestigious awards to the arts, the fact not one critic is on the ultimately decisive board is pretty shocking. And insulting to the arts.
Can you 
really Redundant adverb imagine any of these people--let's just say even the New York-based ones--seeing any of the plays nominated? Or is the theatre going experience of journalist cognoscenti like Nicholas Lemann and Tom Friedman limited to a token Manhattan Theatre Club subscription?
Ok, I don't know if either of them subscribes to MTC. But it shouldn't surprise us that not even 9 out of this group (that "majority") could get behind any of the three choices of the eminent juror panel. And that a "three-quarters majority" (so, 12?) had no problem completely overruling them in favor of probably the only play they had seen all year that fit the qualifications (i.e. it wasn't British, it wasn't Shakespeare, and it wasn't a revival).
Here's another theory: are the scripts of the plays provided for the jurors, and the board, 
Redundant commas cutting out a restrictive element to read? Since very few people saw the nominated plays, one would hope everyone at least read them. However--while I didn't see them, I know enough about the work of Rinde Eckert and Eisa Davis (basically performance artists) and know from the reviews of "Elliot"--that these are profoundly 
Redundant adverb visual and performative works. In nominating these titles, the jurors were also taking the bold step of saying the most exciting new plays out there are not necessarily primarily 
Redundant adverbs literary.
(I can't help wondering if the same problem is what hurt the two-woman AIDS documentary piece In The Continuum--the play rumored to be the juror's favorite last year.)
I can only imagine these three scripts might have been baffling reads for the board. (Imagine reading an avant-garde theatre text for the first time, without the visual aid/supplement of performance.) At least, a lot more grueling a read than... Rabbit Hole?
Yes, Rabbit Hole is easy to like, if what you ask from theatre is just good story, poignant emotion, and a glamorous lead performance. And, yes, it also hails from both Manhattan Theatre Club and South Coast Rep. (Ok, I dropped those names earlier as a setup.) So no matter the merits of the play, what a safe, safe pick.
Which is probably
 Redundant adverb  exactly what the board considers its charge to do.
All Pulitzer info from the official site. (No direct links to specific pages possible. So, happy hunting!)
Posted by The Playgoer   
10 comments:
YS said...
Paul Tash speaks:  E-mail this item
Print this Page
Add Your Comments on this Article 
   
       |     Thanks very much for the chance to be   with you today at the Inland Press Association, and for Redundant comma dividing compound adverbial   prepositional phrases the chance to come home for a short while to the Midwest.   I grew up down the road a ways in a place called   South Bend, Indiana, and went   to journalism school at Indiana    University. Indiana   produces lots of journalists, many of whom migrate to other places -- like Florida. I tell   folks that Hoosiers make good journalists, Comma cuts off a trailing restrictive adverbial   clause.partly because after Indiana, everything   else is interesting. (But only folks from Indiana   can say that.)     It was that connection between I.U. and Nelson   Poynter that brought me to the St. Petersburg   Times, where I started working as a reporter in 1978. If you'd told me then that I would still be at the   St. Pete Times 24 years later, I would have been pretty skeptical, because Comma cuts off a trailing restrictive adverbial   clause. that wasn't the pattern of the business or the   reputation of our newspaper. At that time, the St. Pete Times   was sort of "Nelson Poynter's Finishing School for   Journalists." But the grown-ups there   kept giving me new things to do that always seemed more interesting than what anybody else was offering. Shift in point of view. Lo and   behold, the skinny kid who was a cub reporter now finds   himself responsible not only for the   news report, Comma separates a correlative. but also   for the business operations of Florida's   largest daily newspaper.     So, I've   One can begin a sentence with a   coordinating conjunction but can't put a comma after it. seen first-hand how the news and   business operations of the newspaper relate to each   other. Fragment: We allow Faulkner and Proust these but not Tash until he   learns where to put commas and where not to put them. How they can get in each   other's way, but mostly how they rely on each other.     Okay, I'm a newsie who was steeped in the hard-charging journalism values   of Gene Patterson and Andy Barnes, but let   me be the first to acknowledge what some of my   colleagues in the profession occasionally overlook: for a news organization to be strong, its business operations must be   strong.     Last week, for example, the St. Petersburg   Times took   an unprecedented step for a North American newspaper by   buying the naming rights to a major sports and   entertainment center. This is   persiflage. Everybody knows this move was to twit the   Tampa Tribune because the   building is in Tampa. That   building had been   known as: Passive and wordy edit: Use “was.” the Ice   Palace, the home to   the Tampa Bay Lightning NHL hockey team and a very Strunk   & White’s redundant adverb successful concert venue. Now   it's the "St. Pete   Times Forum." Starting this year, the   Times will pay $2.1-million a year, plus provide some free advertising, to have our name on one of the   most busy Clunky modifier: “busiest” is idiomatic. and visible places in the Tampa    Bay   area. Next spring, the St. Pete Times Forum will host the   opening rounds of the NCAA basketball   tournament, dear to the heart of any true Hoosier, and   Redundant comma splits a compound   verb. is in the running for the Republican   National Convention in 2004.     That would be a delicious irony, since Redundant   comma cuts off a trailing restrictive adverbial   clause. the newspaper   for which it is named passive:   Use “from which its name comes” has never supported a Republican candidate   for president. My favorite quote in the coverage   about the name change last week came from a GOP bigwig who noted that most Republicans in Florida   had started out as Democrats but had   been Dump: change   to active voice. converted. "Maybe," he said, "we can   even convert the St. Pete Times."     But best of all, Comma   severs a restrictive prepositional phrase. from our   standpoint, the   Ice Palace   (oops, make that the St. Pete Times Forum), sits   smack dab   The   Hoosier leitmotif that   dominates the diction of this lucubration ranks   relentless, but “smack dab” goes   too far with the Eiron pose and exposes Tash’s hand. Le Tash thinks his forced   folksiness fools us that we are his intellectual superiors when he is the   brains in the room. in downtown Tampa, at the   heart of the metropolitan region. We think this deal both validates and also advances an image   of the newspaper we have been   building for the last 15 years: the St. Pete Times   is the dominant newspaper throughout the   Tampa Bay region. As I mentioned earlier, the St. Petersburg Times is already the   largest daily newspaper in Florida, and we sell roughly   110,000 copies a day more than any other   newspaper in the Tampa Bay region.     But some folks still have trouble seeing the   St. Pete Times as the newspaper   for Tampa    Bay. Mr. Tash is greedy. The bigots are entitled to their newspaper; The Tribune has served   that purpose for many a moon. We think this deal will help us make stronger connections with some key   customer groups: national advertisers, especially those 20-something   media buyers who move restlessly Redundant   modifier through the ad agencies. Young   readers, who are not connecting with newspapers the way   earlier generations, did. Fragment And   readers outside St. Petersburg, especially   Redundant adverb readers in Tampa, where our circulation is already showing   strong gains -- but where we obviously   Redundant adverb want more. Fragment      So, Redundant   comma this naming rights deal is   designed Passive: use “will bolster.” to bolster our long-term business interests, and Wrong   conjunction: “but” makes sense. it will   cause some complications for our newsroom. Initially, there was some controversy because the financial terms   were not disclosed   Passive: "The parties did not   disclose..." when the deal was   announced. Inept sentence   Edit: The parties’ not disclosing the   financial terms caused   controversy at first. were not open. Even though it was a financial deal between two   private companies, some people thought it   Two “it’s” in a sentence   cause confusion. was hypocritical   for a newspaper that presses for public disclosure to keep these numbers private. Edit “Despite the deal’s being between private   companies, some people called hypocritical a newspaper’s   keeping the numbers private   with its history of pressing for public   disclosure.”So, No comma three days after the deal   was announced, Passive. Edit: “So three days after the agreement, the building owners released the   financial terms: This colon   gets the support of no known   use of the colon. Jettison it. with our support and   encouragement.     Longer term, my news colleagues will have to   demonstrate show   that our coverage of the Lightning, of the St. Pete Times Forum and the   concerts that play there Dump. remains clear-eyed   and Wordy unaffected by   the fact that because our name is on the building. Some   media critics and our competitors immediately   Redundant   adverbs subtract from   credibility. They say, “Aw, c’mon. You’ve got to believe me.” criticized   our decision, saying it would   inevitably blemish our reputation for strong ethics and impartial coverage.     Personally, Redundant adverb I've got more faith in our newsroom to base coverage on the readers' interests and not on our   business interests. Twice in my decade as editor, our news coverage has cost the advertising department $1-million in lost business -- without   a peep of complaint from the ad folks. And even   though we have a substantial marketing sponsorship of the Tampa    Bay   Devil Rays, our lead baseball writer irritated the team   owner so much once that he pulled all our newspaper   racks from the stadium.     I've also got more   confidence in our readers than the media critics may have. The readers will be keeping an eye on us, and they'll   quickly Redundant   adverb know if we're pulling punches or playing favorites. 
 
    Some of our critics have noted that until now, no   newspaper has Dump put its name on a   stadium or an arena, with the suggestion that journalism ethics have held others back. Our critics are right that   the St.     Petersburg   Times broke new ground   last week, but I think Wordy throatclearing the reasons have more to do with business than with journalism.     For one thing, there aren't many competitive   newspaper towns left in America.   As I said earlier, Jettison stocking stuffer. one of the key factors in our             |               |             thinking was the chance to help establish the   St. Petersburg   Times as the premier   newspaper for the entire Redundant adjective Tampa   bay area. Only one-third of the circulation of   the St. Pete Times   is in St. Petersburg   itself.     But an even bigger   factor is that most newspapers would have a hard time taking on a new expense -- especially during tough economic times. Like   all of you, we've noticed that business isn't exactly   great these days, and if we were   trying only Handwringing present-progressive verb and redundant   adverb to boost our profits in the short term, we   wouldn't be committing   Progressive verbs sound dithering. Simple verbs “tried” and “commit” are   crisper and more convincing. to this new   level of expense -- about $1.5-million a year above and beyond what we were already spending. spent     On the other hand, Dump; "also" is sufficient transition. we also   wouldn't have expanded steadily Redundant adverb into new territories   outside St. Petersburg   over the last three decades, because   Comma cuts off a restrictive   adverbial clause. getting each of those new editions established cost money that would have dropped to   the bottom line. And consequently, Tiresome   redundant adverb we'd have been a   nicely Another one   profitable little Too coy by far   newspaper, hemmed   Redundant   comma cuts off a restrictive   past participial phrase. in on three sides by water and   by competitors on the fourth, Stop this   metastasis here. Start a new sentence. our own   fortunes tied to those of a mid-sized city with   limited room for growth and a steadily   Redundant adverb younger   population base. Instead, our circulation area   stretches for nearly 100   miles along the west coast of Florida, and we are increasingly Redundant adverb making good on our business goal: to be the newspaper for all of   Tampa Bay.     It has taken a long   time and a lot of money and effort to establish ourselves as the hometown newspaper in lots of places beyond our   original hometown. It has taken a big circulation   force, Redundant comma cutting off   a restrictive adjectival infinitive phrase. both to sell and deliver the newspaper. It's taken a big advertising   staff, with reps selling into part- and full-run   sections. It's taken one of the most   complex patterns of production and distribution in the business, as   Redundant comma severing a   restrictive trailing adverbial clause we try to adapt the various editions to the tastes and interests   Dump one. of readers in   specific areas.     And most of all, it   Pronoun   reference: a new paragraph   should not start with a pronoun with no   antecedent so that the reader   must plod back through the previous paragraph to discover it or, worse, to provide the   reference him- or herself. has taken a huge commitment to   journalism. We have devoted dozens of   reporters, editors and photographers -- plus the copy editors and designers to pull their work together -- to local   coverage. Those local   sections may reach as few as 20,000 subscribers, but a story or photo costs the same to create as if we sent it to the full   audience. Andy Barnes, my boss and patron, observed wistfully I shall allow this adverb because of its piquant improbability. One cannot imagine   Andrew Barnes’s being wistful. The first time I saw him was when he first came to the   area and turned up at a community luncheon carrying a tome by Spinoza   or Foucault or some such deep thinker   under his arm to remind us rubes what   a whiz had reified into our midst. He would flag down people in the street to tell them that   he came from The Washington Post. once   that we probably spend a greater proportion of our budget on local   news than any other newspaper our size. Yes, I agreed,   and if we didn't spend so much on   local news, we wouldn't be a newspaper our size.     At the outset   of my remarks, People want to kill you for this locution. It's   fusty, pretentious, and evokes the image of a never-ending lucubration   of killing ennui. I acknowledged a point that some journalists need to remember: that   the news report can be strong only if the business that   supports it is vigorous.     But there's an important corollary that often   gets overlooked, especially No comma: it   cuts off a restrictive adverbial prepositional phrase. Cut   redundant adverb. in   newspaper publishing circles: that a newspaper   ultimately can be strong as a business only   if its news report and editorial comment is   Subject-verb agreement error: report and   comment are. worth reading. Sure, profits can   be higher this year if we drop a reporter   or two, or Redundant   comma: the coordinating conjunction between the items in   a series replaces any commas. if we can trim some newshole out of the newspaper, or if Redundant   comma splits compound dependent clauses.we can cut back on travel and   drop some syndicates. Don't get me wrong: if   done carefully, all those things can   be accomplished Passive verb Edit: we can accomplish… without   any real damage to the news report or reader   satisfaction. We've taken our share of austerity measures at   the St. Petersburg   Times to help get us   through one of the coldest and longest winters in   newspaper advertising that anybody can remember.     But let's not kid ourselves: readers can tell   when we're stretching the   soup, This is the first fresh metaphor Le Tash has   managed to muster. I like it. and if   they stop ordering from our menu, we're not left with much of a   business.     Al Neuharth, the former chairman of Gannett,   spoke to the Florida   state newspaper convention last summer -- and scolded   this generation of editors and   publishers for letting circulation fall during the last decade. Even during a period of great growth in the state population, the combined daily circulation   of Florida   newspapers had dropped from 3.1-million daily copies to 2.9-million, Neuharth said, and he called   those figures "disgraceful."     Part of the problem,   Neuharth said, is that too many publishers are focused too much on the bottom line rather than growing their circulation and   their business. I thought some of those in the audience   would choke on their chicken dinner, given Neuharth's   own role in driving up the profits that most   owners and investors have come to expect from newspapers. Al Neuharth complaining   Possessive   before the gerund that we're too focused on   profits? What's next? Hugh Hefner suggesting Possessive before the   gerund we're too obsessed with sex?     But I was reminded of another speech I heard this   year. At the Poynter Institute for Media   Studies, Jack Fuller of Tribune Company said   Commas   to set of a nonrestrictive   prepositional phrase that the profit magin   Make   friends with the spell checker to catch goofy errors such as this. of   the Chicago   Tribune had gone from   roughly 8 percent in 1980 to 30 percent by 2000, 20   years later.     Okay, okay. This isn't supposed to be a speech   about the right profit level for newspapers. My   assignment is to determine whether newspapers can meet their business and journalistic obligations at   the same time. For the record: Dump this   shop-worn phrase. I don't see how you can publish a great   newspaper without having a strong business, and   unless you publish an interesting, entertaining, compelling and provocative news report, you won't have much of a   business for very long. So from my standpoint, the   question about news vs. business values   isn't a very productive question because it often leads to some false choices and dead ends.     Here's the problem, from my   perspective. Wordy: Dump it. The editors say they need more reporters and newshole. The publishers   dismiss them as fuzzy-thinking romantics who don't have   a clue about the demands of the business. The editors   dismiss the publishers as mouth-breathing,   money-grubbing neanderthals. Capitalize. End of discussion. Only   Proust and Faulkner have earned the right to fragments.     Think about how the   conversation might change if we framed the issue as long-term business values versus short-term business values. In that   context, good journalism is a long-term business value. So is Subject-verb   agreement: Are circulation development and growth. So is advertising market share. Profit   margins, on the   other hand, are more a short-term business value. I'm not   knocking profits; I'm very much in favor of them. But   they are by no means the only measure -- or even the   most important measure -- of the health of our   businesses.     As a journalist, and I still think of myself as a   journalist, With your frail grasp of grammar and punctuation, you do less harm where you are. Keep away from the news   room. I'd welcome some fresh terms and new ways of   thinking about this debate within our business.   It shouldn't just be editors and reporters who are making a ruckus or   stirring the pot Cite one or   the other: not both. about cutbacks and the potential   damage they cause. I get tired of hearing the   familiar laments, and some of them are self-interested, arising at the journalism conventions -- and only at the journalism   conventions.     Some good folks at the Poynter Institute and   other organizations are trying now to develop   the business case for good journalism. At the   University    of North     Carolina, Professor   Phil Meyer is exploring the statistical connection between a   newspaper's circulation and the size of its news staff. But   these issues are much too important to the   business of journalism to be left only to the   journalists.     Imagine how much more healthy and   interesting the conversation could be if we had business-side   executives -- circulation and advertising directors -- asking   pointed questions about a declining audience,   what it means to the business, and No comma between a compound noun restrictive   appositive what we can do to shore up our claim on the time and attention of readers.     As an editor, I'd   welcome the company. We might even have Al Neuharth standing with us. And if nothing else, that would make many of the   editors I know stop cold in their tracks and take a   fresh look at their positions.     Thanks very much for your kind invitation and   attention today. I'd be pleased to hear your   reactions and observations.     Paul Tash   is editor and president of the St.     Petersburg   Times. He delivered these remarks to the Inland Press Association on Sept. 12,    2002.     |   
   
     
    
Post a Comment