The Jounalistic SP Times Priesthood Sinks Davis, Exalts Smith, Cuffs Around the English Language
St. Petersburg Times Gentlemen Editorial-board
(I bet you all are) Pooh-bahs and suchlike Zeus personae of your paper's y-chromosome-weighted Olympian caste system:
Your Sunday endorsement essay (included below) on Smith and Davis is not bad. It represents little rhetorical felicity: no vivid diction, no sophisticated structure, no startling insights. It's meat-and-potatoes style provides homely fare. But I have seen The NY Times editorial grandees do worse.
That paper’s cozened denizens doubtless get lamb chops and baby asparagus for lunch in chambers provided by the dumbest publisher in the newspaper world. Y’all, I bet, get Chinese in the cafeteria with plastic forks.
Considerate writing demands that you acquaint yourselves with hyphens. They help readers understand a sentence when you use them before a noun preceded by words used as a single adjective.
You did not disgrace yourselves with passive verbs, but you’re not on the wagon with them yet. They make what you say sound duplicitous and weak—both of which readers suspect anyway. And passive verbs are always wordier than active verbs. Rid your writing of pussy-footing passive verbs, and you will ascend to Grub Street paradise and hang out with Mencken.
You can get away with an idiomatic “it” or two, but you must be solicitous enough of your readers to provide the word you mean instead of resorting to broad-pronoun reference. Readers shouldn’t have to do your work for you and ponder what fugitive antecedent the writer means.
Diction forensics--“charismatic”; “courageous”; “solid” -- betray your real reason for favoring Smith: This is a guy’s guy, a farm-boy macho specimen whom you would invite into Mystic Krewe’s sweat lodge in the middle of the clearing, not to smoke rabbit tobacco, which every Georgia farm girl such as I knows intimately, but to smoke roll-your-own Prince Albert’s because that is what Smith first contaminated his lungs with behind the barn.
Had any--or at least more--women huddled on the endorsement vote,
But
Besides, to top his list of pluses,
No woman named Peggy ever blabs your secrets or tattles that she spotted you at the beauty parlor looking like hell coming out from under the drier. We trust Peggys. And most voters are women. And, hurrah, we outlive the stronger sex. Na, na, na.
I bestow a B- on this essay and advise you to see me in my office after class.
lee drury de cesare, sporadic reader, constant critic
Sunday, August 13
(St. Petersburg Times Editorial Board) Both Rod Smith and Jim Davis have solid records of service. But Smith has the leadership style needed to bring both parties together.
Democrats have an opportunity this year to restore some measure of political balance to
Both Smith and U.S. Rep. Jim Davis of
At the same time, it is hard to find significant policy differences between the two Democrats. Davis and Smith Davis’s and Smith’s: You need separate possession before “support.”support [for]preserving abortion rights, reviewing sales tax hyphenated “sales-tax” exemptions and creating an independent commission to redraw legislative and congressional districts. Both have plans to raise teacher salaries and transform the FCAT into a diagnostic tool to help students rather than punish schools. Both oppose altering the class size hyphenate amendment, changing the state Constitution to allow tuition vouchers and altering the Save Our Homes hyphenate amendment in ways that could exacerbate inequities or decimate local government budgets.
While both candidates have proposals for dealing with the property insurance hyphenate crisis, Smith's is more comprehensive and ambitious. While
The choice between Smith and Davis boils down to electability and the ability to govern. In style, temperament and experience, Smith is best suited: Comparative “better suited”: you have only two. to make the case that the Democrats' values match mainstream
In 2000, Smith won a north
Most importantly, Smith has repeatedly demonstrated he is a charismatic leader who can bring together Democrats and Republicans to take courageous stands under enormous pressure. He helped lead a coalition of senators who refused to let Bush and the Legislature no capital defy the courts and interfere with Terri Schiavo's constitutional right to have her end of life hyphenate wishes carried out. This past legislative session, Smith held another bipartisan group together that prevented the Republican leadership from trying to restore tuition vouchers that the Florida Supreme Court had found unconstitutional. He did the same thing to make sure voters weren't confronted with a convoluted proposal to gut the class size hyphenate amendment. In an era when extreme partisans define…both political parties… both major political parties are often defined by their most extreme partisans, Florida needs a governor who can reach across party lines and lead by consensus.
The Times Why does The Times not observe the protocol of treating a newspaper as a book and italicize? Is the problem newspaper rebellious idiom, or is the problem ignorance? recommends Rod Smith for the Democratic nomination for governor.